• TV
  • Movies
  • More TV. On more devices.
Search
RSS

Exclusive Interview: John Krasinski

September 17th, 2009 by Rebecca Harper Editor

We all know him as Jim, the affable, shaggy-haired salesman from the Dunder Mifflin paper company. But actor John Krasinski (who also appeared in this summer’s Away We Go) has set out to prove he’s no one-trick pony. With his latest project, a film adaptation of the late David Foster Wallace’s Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, Krasinski proves he can hold his own behind the camera, as well, directing such stars as Will Arnett, Will Forte, Christopher Meloni, Bobby Cannavale and Timothy Hutton. Today Hulu premieres an exclusive “making of” featurette (featuring an intro from Krasinski himself) for this pet project. We also had the opportunity to speak to the 29-year-old actor about the film, which hits theaters September 25. (You can watch the trailer here.) And for all of you Pam and Jim fans — is that “Jam” or “Pim?” — we asked for a little scoop about the Season 6 premiere of The Office, which airs on NBC tonight at 9 p.m. ET/PT. We’ll have it on Hulu first thing tomorrow morning. — Rebecca Harper (), Editor

There’s a bit of an announcement we’re hoping you can make about Brief Interviews with Hideous Men. Can you tell us about that?
John Krasinski:
Hulu’s premiering the movie first on the Internet [after it finishes its run in theaters], so we’re a part of that, and that’s fantastic. I think anybody in this business would be incredibly fortunate to be a part of anything having to do with Hulu, to be honest. Hulu is one of those ideas that is so cutting edge, that you just know it’s going to be a huge, huge part of people’s lives from now on. Not only for what it is doing and is capable of doing now as an interactive site, but also for what it has potential to grow into, which I think is nothing short of world domination. [Laughs] So we have that to look forward to, that our president will be Hulu.

To have Hulu support you in any way and display the ads for the movie and things like that is incredibly exciting, but then to have the movie be premiered on Hulu after its first run in the theaters is incredible. I think that Hulu’s done an incredible amount for The Office, and we are indebted to [Hulu] in a huge way. I think that it’s a massive part of our popularity, and why people have continued to watch us. We’re really, really lucky to be part of it — I have had experience with being part of a project [The Office] that benefits from being on site like Hulu, so to have our movie on Hulu and accessible to anyone at anytime, it’s really an honor, to be honest.

Well, thanks! And of course, I would say we wouldn’t be Hulu without The Office.
Awww, that’s nice.

Now you lined up some really incredible people for this project. Did you have some of the actors in mind from the start?
Absolutely. When I got the pilot to The Office, I used that money to buy the rights [to the book], but I had actually started writing the script a little bit before I got the rights, which was incredibly — in a negative way — ambitious. I’m sure it’s what more people would call stupid. In doing so, I started writing the script and knew exactly who I was going to cast. At the time, I was waiting tables in New York, and though I was having a great time, I wasn’t necessarily creatively stimulated, so I was constantly looking for inspiration anywhere I could find it. I definitely found it all the time in the theaters, by going to the theater, and by going to independent movies. I just consistently did that as often as I could. The people who I saw have these awe-inspiring performances were the people that I knew I wanted to be in this movie. And all these incredible New York actors who were just so brilliant on stage and in these small, independent movies, where a lot of them were coming out in New York, I just knew that those were the people I wanted in it, and I was just lucky enough to get them.

This being tied to David Foster Wallace, did that make it easier to get these actors?
Yeah, I’m sure it did. I think that being part of a project that is not only based on but also very much his actual writing … The movie’s not at all based on the book. It is completely the material itself. In doing this movie, my only intention was to bring his material to a wider audience in a different medium, but in no way to take the movie and change it in some drastic way. My being involved in the movie and so connected to the book was because of his writing, so I just wanted to do him justice and sort of show more people how incredible this author is and show what an impact he could have on you. I think that, truly, without him knowing it, I think David Foster Wallace wrote near-perfect acting material in these characters. So I didn’t have to pitch the movie very hard to these actors who I said had to come in a day, maybe two for some of them, and have these interviews that they could basically act in one day and really sink their teeth into. They very much appreciated it.

As a writer, how do you approach such a revered author’s work? I would have been intimidated!
Yeah, it’s funny, because to be really honest, Brief Interviews is the anomaly, I think. I can totally see why he hasn’t been adapted before, because his work is incredibly intimidating in that respect. It’s intimidating because you’re so admiring of it as a reader. When you’re a reader of his books, it’s a unique experience that you’ll never have with anyone else. I think he’s bar none one of the best writers ever to have lived, and he’s right up there on the pedestal with all the greats, in my opinion. And the real truth is, there’ll ever be anyone who writes like him again. For me, this book is the anomaly because he actually wrote these characters speaking dialogue, so there are actual words being said that were actually written as characters representing themselves. To me, it was almost near-perfect dialogue and the biggest challenge was editing it down to a piece that could actually fit into a watchable movie rather than an epic miniseries or something. And then also, he was also an incredibly literary guy, and so there were moments where I chose to leave some of the literary vibe into the dialogue, and some where I had to tone it down in order to allow the guys to be a little more accessible. But other than that, really, the script in the movie is all David’s work. I can’t take much credit for it, because the work he did as a writer in this story is what brings such incredible life to these characters.

I understand that he actually called you to give you his blessing. How did that call go?
It was thrilling, for lack of a better word, it was just fantastic. He was incredibly kind, and incredibly generous. I remember him being so soft-spoken and so nice. He put me at ease right away. I remember him being flattered that someone had taken up this book and tried to run it up the hill. He told me that his intention for Brief Interviews was to write a story about a character that you never see or hear from, but by using all the characters around that person, you find out all you need to know about them. And that’s exactly what I’d done. I’d already written the script when I talked to him, and I’d done just that in the script, because all the signs were there. It was just incredible to have that connection with him; that I was not only on the right path, but charging down the right way. It was so inspiring and such a pick-me-up that it was a great way to go into the actual shooting of the movie, knowing that we were on the right path and that we were representing him in the correct way.

You know, the big cinematic move that I did and probably the biggest part of the adaptation that I did is that [the female lead, played by Julianne Nicholson] connected to one of the characters, and I remember he was incredibly excited about that. He said that he had seen Brief Interviews as sort of an incomplete project because it hadn’t fully tied into itself, and there was nothing that could tie them all together. So when I sort of brought one of the characters in the book and connected it to her personally, all of a sudden there was a linear aspect to the movie. I had written one draft that was extremely linear and had all these incredible arcs that were fitting in pretty well, but at the end, when you re-read it, you realized that it just didn’t feel right, that it was feeling forced and fake. And so I realized that the best way to adapt the book was to go back and allow it to be what it wanted to be, which was spontaneous and slightly erratic and something that basically presented itself when it wanted to present itself.

You end up appearing in the film, but that wasn’t always your intention.
It wasn’t at all. My intention was solely to direct. I was pretty sure that these actors could do any of these characters way better than I could, but then we had an actor pull out at the last minute. There was this scheduling conflict, just one of those things that happens. We only had two weeks until we shot the scene. Normally that would be fine, but unfortunately that is such a big monologue and, as such, a huge part of the movie. I had shot all of the other interviews, so it was the last one and it needed to fit in just right. It would be a very stressful situation for any actor to just come in and sort of take on that much dialogue and that much intricate storytelling without knowing any of the other pieces, and I was the only one who knew the pieces. So the producers and I sat down and we decided that I’d be the best person to do it, solely because I’d read it 100 times, for no other reason than I knew what I was talking about when I was sort of relating the story to her and how it would connect to everything else.

Because this was a passion project for you, was the acting easier for you?
It was by far the scariest performance I have ever given; rather, it was the most scared performance I’ve ever given. It has solely to do with the fact that I was the director, and not because it hard to direct myself or anything like that — that’s not at all what happened. The reason why it was so scary was that I had sat behind the monitor and watched all these incredible actors turn in performances that were nothing short of awe-inspiring. The day before, we had shot the bathroom scene, which is one of my favorite scenes in the movie, and so to literally be the last person to go and to be the last piece of the puzzle, and to know that if this didn’t work, the movie wouldn’t work, was probably the worst position I could have put myself in. But I really didn’t want to fail everybody else. Hopefully it works out.

I can imagine how challenging this must have been for you, but I think it worked, I really do. But I have to ask — on behalf of all of the fans of The Office — can you tell us what we’re going to see in the new season? A little teaser, perhaps?
It’s funny, the season premiere is just sort of an old-time structure of The Office — it’s just a really funny episode of The Office. There aren’t necessarily any incredible spoilers; it’s sort of getting back to the season in a way that I think is a really smart way to do it, which is just getting everyone back in the office. But then definitely the wedding episode is coming up and it is fantastic. I think that — and I think I can speak on behalf of the entire cast when I say this — we’re all just huge fans of the show and we love it so much. To get those scripts, we’re as excited as any fan would be to see what’s going to happen next, the way they deal with the wedding and how [Pam and Jim] get together. It’s a scary thing to get married on a show, because it’s always a tough conundrum of whether it’s good for the show or bad for the show. Of course the writers are so fantastic that they did it perfectly.

Last season was such a great season that I really can’t wait to see what’s in store now. Well, thanks, John for your time – we really appreciate it.
Absolutely. Thank you.

Last comment: about 15 hours ago 11 Comments

Hu-Listic: Social Hulu

September 16th, 2009 by Jocelyn Matsuo Asst Video Editor

Each week, Hulu’s Video Editor, Jocelyn Matsuo unearths little-known treasures from the Hulu library.

Online video can often stifle a party, however the UK comedy series, Banzai has resuscitated some of mine — with gambling. Ever fancy yourself a good judge of character? Try your hand at some of these less-usual wagers:

How long can this man shake hands with Angelina Jolie?

Which old lady will win this game of wheelchair chicken?

This is a great series to subscribe to or add to your Hulu queue. When videos are in your queue, they play automatically, so you won’t need an HJ (that’d be a “Hulu Jockey”) and you won’t watch anything twice. If you don’t know how Hulu’s queue feature works, click here for a Hulu How-To.

Step right up and place your bets,
Jocelyn Matsuo
Hulu’s Banzai Bookie

Leno Goes Prime Time

September 15th, 2009 by Rebecca Harper Editor

All the greats have done it: The Rolling Stones, Brett Favre, Lance Armstrong … Cher. This week, former Tonight Show host Jay Leno came out of retirement to return to network television on “The Jay Leno Show. His mission: to give NBC a ratings boost and get more viewers to stick around for the 11 o’clock news. On a teleconference last week, Leno told reporters he was still felt pretty laid back about his new gig, and that it was “not as nerve-wracking as taking over for Johnny [Carson]” when he became host of “The Tonight Show” in 1992.

The decision to bring Leno to primetime has been full of controversy — first there was speculation that he’d leave NBC to host another late-night talk show to compete with Conan O’Brien; more recently, there has been talk that Leno’s foray into the 10 o’clock hour will pull top-tier guests away from O’Brien’s Tonight Show. It’s too early to tell how Leno’s five nights of comedy will affect ratings. In the meantime, the Hulu Team took a look at the new show’s format to see how it stacks up against his No. 1-ranked late-night format. — Rebecca Harper (rebecca.harper@hulu.com) for the Yahoo! TV Blog

What Stayed the Same: A-List Celebs
Just as he did on The Tonight Show, Leno is still booking top-tier guests, including Jerry Seinfeld, who’s currently promoting a Seinfeld reunion that’s coming to HBO’s But Leno’s also out to prove that he can pull in the big names in the midst of controversy. See: last night’s interview with Kanye West coming off the Taylor Swift debacle during the MTV Video Music Awards. Much like he did with actor Hugh Grant in the midst of a 1995 prostitute scandal, Leno showed he wasn’t scared to ask the tough questions. In the end, West seemed repentant and Jay came off as a good guy who’s willing to make his guests sweat a little, but only when appropriate. Was West prepared for Leno’s questions? Probably, but his apology came off as the real deal.

What’s New: No Desk
To separate himself from the late-night talk show hosts, Leno said goodbye to the oversize desk he used to sit behind, opting instead to spend most of his airtime on his feet. The new format is broken up into several acts — standup, comedy bits, interviews, musical performance, headlines — and Jay stuck to center stage for much of that. A conversation area set up with two chairs for himself and a guest, such as Seinfeld. But the joke was on Leno during Seinfeld’s interview as the comedian proved that he could reel in a major star like Oprah.

What Stayed the Same: The Monologue
In the three months since Leno left late night, he’s toured the country performing standup, and just as he did on The Tonight Show, he kicked things off with an opening monologue. Though a few of the jokes called on some older headlines (the government’s Cash for Clunkers program, for instance), Leno came off loose and confident as he poked fun at everyone from Serena Williams and Dick Cheney.

What’s New: More Comedy Bits
In the premiere episode of The Jay Leno Show, Leno told the audience he spent much of his time off taking in comedy acts all over the country. We can expect comic sketches to be a regular occurrence — Leno let us know that comedienne Rachel Harris will be sharing ways to cut back spending, for example, while writer Liz Feldman will be teaching senior citizens how to use Twitter. On opening night, Leno called in Dan Finnerty, lead singer of The Dan Band from The Hangover. (Finnerty put on a great show in the wedding scene at the end.) Finnerty took his boom-box and two backup singers to the local carwash and serenaded an unsuspecting woman who simply wanted a cleaner ride. Though she was somewhat reluctant about this free concert, she wound up being a good sport.

What Stayed the Same: Crowd Pleasers
The former King of Late Night had a number of bits that came up regularly while he hosted The Tonight Show, and many people wondered if we’d see any Headlines and Jaywalking in primetime. Fear not, because Headlines wrapped up the show on Monday night, and promotional teasers indicate some Jaywalking moments are on the way. It turns out, NBC wants some comedy to lead into the 11 o’clock news for the local affiliates, so we’ll see less music (Leno says he’s focusing on unusual pairings such as the first episode’s Jay-Z-Rihanna-Kanye West matchup) and more laughs, instead. So headline writers, beware! Leno’s got his sights set on you.

What’s New: More World Leaders
OK, this one’s a bit of a stretch, but Leno told reporters that we’ll be seeing more world leaders on his new show. Instead of asking hard-hitting policy questions, though, he says he plans to ask celebrity-minded questions instead. We suspect these high-profile interviews will be similar to this spliced up sit-down with President Obama, where Leno’s editors do a great job of piecing together a Q&A session with the nation’s leader. Is it for real? Absolutely not. But it’s funny.

Which Tonight Show with Jay Leno bits do you hope to see make it to prime time?

Interview with Green Wing’s Tamsin Greig

September 14th, 2009 by Rebecca Harper Editor

You asked for more Green Wing and, with the help of our partners at Digital Rights Group (who’ve also brought us, among others, Spaced, Kingdom and Peep Show), you can catch the second season of the absurd hospital comedy here on Hulu. To kick off the debut, Hulu spoke to the show’s star, Tamsin Greig, about her character, Dr. Caroline Todd. — Rebecca Harper (), Editor

Can you give us a one-sentence summary of the show?
Tamsin Greig:
It’s a bizarre, unexpected and sometimes terrifying comedy set in a British hospital where a new member of staff comes in and meets an extraordinary array of surprising characters who work in the hospital, with most of it surrounding the surgical department. And how that woman retains — or otherwise — her sanity in a place of undisguised madness.

Wonderfully put. You, of course, play that new doctor. Can you tell us about your character, Caroline?
Caroline Todd has slightly less control over her limbs that she would like to have, but is unaware of that. She is good at her job but doesn’t know it, and is is at times terrified and anxious and childishly curious about the bizarreness surrounding her, but also finds it almost as though she has come home to weirdness without realizing it.

How is this hospital a hospital unlike any other?
Well, frighteningly, I have to say a number of people who work in the National Health Service here who I’ve met say actually Green Wing is rather like real hospital — they have told me it’s quite like real hospitals. The number is quite high, actually, and I don’t know whether that’s a good thing to promote the show or a bad thing to promote the NHS. I don’t think it’s in any way an extraordinary hospital. It works within a system which, you know, has pretty tough constraints. As you know, in this country, it’s a public health service, so doctors work incredibly long hours under peculiar conditions. So I think that the wildness of the environment, in some ways, adequately reflects the peculiarities of that kind of hyper-existence.

And the one thing I noticed in this particular hospital is that nothing medical ever seems to happen.
[Laughs] We do do a little bit of sewing every now and then on body parts, but the interesting thing about this show is that there are no patients. But there’s a lot of interaction with the people who work in the hospital. But I think the creators of the show were not really that interested in patient-led stories. Because, you know, we have lots of that over here. What they were looking for was just finding a group of people who work together and it could be any environment. Really, the show could have been set anywhere. It could have been set on a space station or on a cruise ship or in a diamond mine. They were just interested in how people in tense situations interact with one another in a work environment. So, in some ways, the patients are unnecessary for the development of these relationships.

Here in the States, Green Wing is often compared to the show Scrubs. Are you familiar with that show?
Yeah, I’ve seen it. I like it. I love the flavor of it. I think it’s darling. I think both shows were being developed at sort of the same time, but I think it’s like that synchronicity where you have the same ideas at the same time. You know that character, Dennis the Menace? It was developed on both sides of the Atlantic at the same time, completely independently. I love that, the idea that when something is going to happen, it’s going to happen at that particular time. There’s a flowering of something extraordinary which is similar… I quite like that, the synchronicity of that.

What are some of your favorite Green Wing episodes, if it’s not asking you to go too far back?
We did this quite a while ago, so it’s difficult to remember specific ones. I can remember in the first season, there’s one episode where my character has a housewarming party and about half the episode is the party. There’s a lot of stuff done on Steadicam, so the Steadicam was like a person at the party, and all these really strange things that happen at the party. It’s cleverly developed, and I like that episode.

We have a special after the second season, which you may well get, and the final scene of that has the most wonderful, most surprising, unexpected, beautiful stunt, which I think America would quite like.

Can you talk about the use of the Steadicam and why the show’s creators decided to go that route for the camerawork?
Yeah, I think what they wanted was a new form of visual storytelling, where it wasn’t done with the traditional wide shot and then the singles and then the cutaways — which has helped television, but it’s become standard. So I think they were very interested in finding a way to engage the audience in a more interactive way, so that the camera is actually part of the action. When we were filming a lot of it, we’d do a lot of it on a single take, so scenes had to be set up very specifically. If there was going to be a reverse shot of someone, the Steadicam would have to do that within the flow of the action, so the cameraman had to have really good thigh muscles and a high boredom threshold, and also an ability to dance because they had to dance within the action. We as actors had done a lot of development in rehearsals, but the cameraman was doing it on the day of, so he had to be pretty nippy. I think probably that it was meant to engage the audience, so much that you actually feel like you’re on the roller coaster with the story.

Is Caroline like you at all? What traits of your own did you bring to the character?
I brought my own hair. I don’t believe that’s the way I walk. I was encouraged to walk in a slightly unguarded, lopsided way, which I feel like I manage to suppress in normal life. We do have quite similar hands, and our eyebrows are the same size, although mine now are slightly smaller having seen them on TV.

What are you up to these days?
I just finished filming for Sky [Network] a two-part adaptation of a Terry Pratchett novel called Going Postal, which we filmed in Budapest. I’ve also just done a BBC adaptation of the Jane Austen novel Emma. And I’m about to start a film which Stephen Frears [The Queen, High Fidelity] is directing called Tamara Drew, in which I will be unrecognizable.

Who are you playing in Emma?
Miss Bates, the lonely, lovely spinster who can’t stop talking. Suprisingly.

You also starred in Black Books. For those of us (OK, me) who are illiterate when it comes to British comedy, can you tell us about it?
Yeah, Black Books … There’s three seasons of that. It’s set in a bookshop run by a curmudgeonly Irish misanthrope called Bernard Black. His main gripe about life is that there are people in the world who want to buy books in his shop. Why he has the shop is never revealed. [Laughs] And why he doesn’t get rid of it is also never divulged. But he runs this bookshop in a very haphazard, drunken way. He has a sidekick/assistant/whipping boy and a friend who has a shop next door, but then loses the shop and just becomes some hanger-on, and that’s the character I play, who is excessively maudlin and as drunken as Bernard is. It’s how the two engage and manipulate and abuse Manny, the assistant.

I love the premise, a bookstore owner who hates selling books.
Hates selling books! But likes drinking and smoking, and doesn’t want to share them with anybody else.

Well thanks, Tamsin, for your time. We can’t wait to dig into Season 2.

Last comment: about 22 hours ago 2 Comments

America’s Got Talent Semifinals: Week 12 Recap

September 11th, 2009 by Rebecca Harper Editor

In the second round of America’s Got Talent semifinals, we saw some more ups and downs as the contestants attempted to prove whether they had what it takes to headline a show in Las Vegas. As judge Piers Morgan said in the results episode, it was a night of two halves: the good and the not-so-good. He used his buzzer liberally, and even Sharon Osbourne gave an act the “X” in hopes of getting a group off the stage. And we don’t blame her: her victims were the FootworKINGz, who channeled their inner Red Rangers with a tribute to the Power Rangers. Turns out Osbourne wanted to see them to do more than a Russian Cossack dance, and we can’t argue with that. The biggest star of the week, though, was Barbara Padilla, who proved that the Vegas Strip just might be ready for some opera. Below, the Hulu team rounds up the five performers who advance to the “America’s Got Talent” finals, which air on NBC Monday night. — Rebecca Harper (), Editor

Barbara Padilla
Thought the “Talent” producers saved the best for last Tuesday night, we had to highlight opera singer Barbara Padilla’s ethereal performance first. The petite, soft-spoken cancer survivor transformed into a true diva — billowy gold gown, hair extensions and all — as the lights found their way to Padilla on center stage. The soprano moved the audience, the judges and those of us at home with her portrayal of “Ave Maria,” getting a standing ovation in return. Even before the week’s results were announced, it was clear Padilla was going on to the finals. After all, Morgan declared that “It was the single greatest vocal performance we’ve ever had on AGT.”

Hairo Torres
Contortionist Hairo Torres once again made his dance routine a narrative, though this time he ditched the nerd act (as we saw in the quarterfinals) and headed to the prom instead. Our head-spinning prom king delivered an energetic, playful number that made good use of his flexibility and break-dancing talents. Thirty-some years after the dawn of B-boying, Torres proved that, if you want to win votes, a healthy shot of breaking will help. He’ll be going on to the finals next week.

Recycled Percussion
The hard-hitting drummers from Manchester, New Hampshire headed to the junk yard to gear up for this week’s semifinal round. From the looks of things, they took whatever they could grab: paint buckets, hubcaps, dashboards and even a beat-up old van. They dazzled Osbourne with their six-pack abs, but their high-octane performance won over the voters, who have sent them on to the next round. They leave the other Vegas-style act, Mario and Jenny, in the dust. What can we say? Mario’s bouncy-ball tap-dancing routine was an obvious misstep this week.

Lawrence Beamen
The smooth-singing bass singer, who relied heavily on gospel standards to get him to the semifinals, went contemporary this week. He sang Alicia Keys’ “Fallin’” to get the ladies in the crowd (and, presumably, at home) all worked up, but we’re inclined to agree with Osbourne: his “acrobatic warbling” was a little overdone this time around, and though we definitely think he deserves a shot at Vegas, we prefer to hear him sing, not show off his vocal range. In a surprise turn, Morgan enjoyed the performance, as did enough voters to get him a free pass to the finals.

Drew Stevyns
Throughout M.C. Nick Cannon’s first season as host of AGT, he’s had some heavy-handed moments on stage. This was particularly evident a few weeks ago when he delivered sister act EriAm‘s fate in the quarterfinals — letting them know, in a surprise twist, that they’d be going on to the semis. Their semifinal performance was a little shaky this week (we blame their song choice), and at the end of the this week’s results episode, it came down to wildcard Drew Stevyns — who we think made it this far based on sheer determination, though his chiseled cheekbones certainly help — and, once again, the EriAm Sisters. The nation sided with the down-on-his-luck singer instead of the bubbly young sisters this week, but we’re sure we’ll hear from at least one of the EriAm girls in years to come.

The final 10 acts have been chosen. What do you think of America’s vote?

Last comment: Jan 26th 2012 2 Comments