<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Policy Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/</link>
	<description>The Hulu Blog: The official source for content updates, site developments and news about Hulu.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonny Wiktor</title>
		<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/comment-page-1/#comment-361462</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Wiktor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hulu.com/?p=1116#comment-361462</guid>
		<description>Simply  wanna  remark  that you have a very  decent website , I like  the design  it  actually stands out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply  wanna  remark  that you have a very  decent website , I like  the design  it  actually stands out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Ways to Keep Your Website Civil &#124; Refinancing</title>
		<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14245</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Ways to Keep Your Website Civil &#124; Refinancing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hulu.com/?p=1116#comment-14245</guid>
		<description>[...] explanation for the policy change stressed the value of real names in promoting civility:  [W]e don&#8217;t ask a lot of our users to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explanation for the policy change stressed the value of real names in promoting civility:  [W]e don&#8217;t ask a lot of our users to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14187</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hulu.com/?p=1116#comment-14187</guid>
		<description>nice changes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice changes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Ways to Keep Your Website Civil &#171; iTAX &#8211; tax news</title>
		<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14121</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Ways to Keep Your Website Civil &#171; iTAX &#8211; tax news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hulu.com/?p=1116#comment-14121</guid>
		<description>[...] explanation for the policy change stressed the value of real names in promoting civility:  [W]e don&#8217;t ask a lot of our users to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explanation for the policy change stressed the value of real names in promoting civility:  [W]e don&#8217;t ask a lot of our users to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalas verdugo</title>
		<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/comment-page-1/#comment-13582</link>
		<dc:creator>dalas verdugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hulu.com/?p=1116#comment-13582</guid>
		<description>Glad to see another site fighting for civil discourse on the Internet. You guys do a great job here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see another site fighting for civil discourse on the Internet. You guys do a great job here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pax</title>
		<link>http://blog.hulu.com/2009/08/15/policy-update/comment-page-1/#comment-13455</link>
		<dc:creator>Pax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hulu.com/?p=1116#comment-13455</guid>
		<description>This is a good first step but will ultimately be ineffective. As you stated, you simply don&#039;t collect enough information to identify users so new anonymous accounts will be created.

A digg-style bury mechanism might be a better approach to the problem so that the community has a chance to police itself. The comment can be automagically deleted (via DB flag only - no actual deletion) after some arbitrary number of buries (let&#039;s say 10). If the offending user continues to make comments that are consistently buried, their ability to make future comments are suspended until such time that they appeal. Admin (you guys) could then reset the numbers for this specific user. The user&#039;s main login screen should also indicate how close they are to having their commenting privileges suspended.

This frees you guys to simply following up on appeals (with some backend resetting via the Admin ControlPanel for successful appeals). This would also reduce the amount of dead accounts by some smaller amount.

Conversely... users who consistently make positive comments (voted up) should be rewarded somehow. Some ideas here but don&#039;t want to make this post too long.

I&#039;m sure all of this has been tabled and discussed already as possible future implementations just wanted to post these thoughts anyway.

Keep up the great work Hulu!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good first step but will ultimately be ineffective. As you stated, you simply don&#8217;t collect enough information to identify users so new anonymous accounts will be created.</p>
<p>A digg-style bury mechanism might be a better approach to the problem so that the community has a chance to police itself. The comment can be automagically deleted (via DB flag only &#8211; no actual deletion) after some arbitrary number of buries (let&#8217;s say 10). If the offending user continues to make comments that are consistently buried, their ability to make future comments are suspended until such time that they appeal. Admin (you guys) could then reset the numbers for this specific user. The user&#8217;s main login screen should also indicate how close they are to having their commenting privileges suspended.</p>
<p>This frees you guys to simply following up on appeals (with some backend resetting via the Admin ControlPanel for successful appeals). This would also reduce the amount of dead accounts by some smaller amount.</p>
<p>Conversely&#8230; users who consistently make positive comments (voted up) should be rewarded somehow. Some ideas here but don&#8217;t want to make this post too long.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure all of this has been tabled and discussed already as possible future implementations just wanted to post these thoughts anyway.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work Hulu!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

